Quick Guide: What You'll Find Here

I've spent the last decade advising retirees. And I can tell you – the question “should a 70 year old get out of the stock market” keeps smart people up at night. One client sold everything after a bad week and missed a five-year rally. Another stayed fully invested, then had to sell at the bottom to pay medical bills.

There's no universal yes or no. But there is a framework that works. Let me walk you through what I've learned (sometimes the hard way).

Why This Question Haunts So Many Retirees

It's not just about fear. At 70, your time horizon shrinks. If the market crashes 30%, you might not have the years to recover – especially if you're already withdrawing money. I've seen people panic-sell after a 10% drop and lock in losses they never recouped.

But here's a non‑consensus take most advisors won't tell you: getting out completely can be just as dangerous. Inflation runs at 3% to 4% on average. Bonds yield maybe 5% now, but after taxes and inflation, that's close to zero. If you live another 20 years (not unusual), a 100% fixed‑income portfolio can silently erode your purchasing power.

My rule of thumb: don't ask “should I get out.” Ask “how much do I really need from stocks to maintain my lifestyle, and what amount can I afford to lose without changing my life?”

The Real Risk Isn't Market Volatility – It's Sequence of Returns

Volatility is scary but temporary. What kills a 70‑year‑old's portfolio is the order of returns. Imagine you retire with $500,000 and the market drops 20% in your first year. You're still withdrawing say $20,000 a year. Now you're selling shares at depressed prices – that's called “reverse dollar cost averaging.”

A bad sequence early can decimate a portfolio even if the market eventually recovers. I had a client who retired in 2008 with 70% stocks. He didn't sell, but he kept withdrawing. By 2011, his portfolio was down 40% compared to someone who had a more balanced mix. That's the sequence risk.

So the real question isn't whether to be in or out – it's how to position your portfolio so a downturn doesn't force you to sell stocks at the worst time.

How Much Stock Should a 70-Year-Old Actually Hold?

There's a classic rule of thumb: “110 minus your age” in stocks. That would give a 70‑year‑old 40% stocks. But I find that too generic. I prefer a bucket strategy that separates your short‑term spending from your long‑term growth.

Bucket Time Horizon Recommended Allocation Example for $500k
Bucket 1 (Cash & Short-term bonds) 0–2 years of expenses 15–20% $75k–$100k
Bucket 2 (Income & Stability) 2–7 years of expenses 30–40% $150k–$200k
Bucket 3 (Growth – Stocks) 7+ years of expenses 40–50% $200k–$250k

Why this works: when the market drops, you don't sell stocks. You spend from Bucket 1 and refill it later from Bucket 2 or 3 when the market recovers. That shields you from the sequence problem.

In practice, I recommend most healthy 70‑year‑olds keep 30–50% in stocks, but only if they can cover 5 years of expenses in safer assets. If you can't, you need to reduce stock exposure or consider part‑time work.

When You Absolutely Need to Cut Back on Stocks

There are specific scenarios where I tell clients to drop to 20% stocks or less:

  • You have a chronic illness or high medical costs that aren't fully covered by insurance.
  • Your only source of income is Social Security and your portfolio – no pension or annuity.
  • You're a renter without a fixed housing cost (inflation‑sensitive).
  • You feel physically ill when the market drops 5%. Emotional panic often leads to bad decisions.

One client came to me after the 2020 crash. He had 80% stocks and couldn't sleep. We moved half his money into a mix of Treasury bonds and a fixed indexed annuity. He slept better, and even though he missed some upside, he also avoided selling at the bottom.

Better Alternatives Than Dumping Everything Into Bonds

If you decide to reduce stocks, don't just pile into long‑term bonds. They have their own risks (duration risk, inflation risk). Here's what I use for clients:

  • TIPS (Treasury Inflation‑Protected Securities) – principal adjusts with inflation. Great for preserving purchasing power.
  • MYGAs (Multi‑Year Guaranteed Annuities) – basically a fixed‑rate CD from an insurance company. Yield often beats bonds, and it's predictable.
  • Dividend‑paying blue‑chip stocks (like utilities or consumer staples) – not as volatile as tech stocks, but still offer growth and income. Keep them in your growth bucket.
  • Real estate investment trusts (REITs) – but only a small slice (5–10%) because they can be volatile too.

I remember a retired teacher who wanted to sell everything because she heard “stocks are risky.” I convinced her to keep 30% in a low‑cost S&P 500 index fund and put the rest in a ladder of short‑term Treasuries and a MYGA. Five years later, she had more income than she started with.

Two 70-Year-Olds, Two Very Different Paths

Case 1: The Risk-Taker

John, 70, had a pension covering 80% of his expenses. His portfolio was $600k, all in stocks. He asked if he should get out. I said: “You have no need to take risk, but you also have capacity – your pension is a safety net.” We moved 2 years of expenses into cash, kept the rest in a diversified 60/40 portfolio. John didn't need to sell stocks for a decade. That gave him time to ride out any downturn.

Case 2: The Overconfident Retiree

Mary, 70, had no pension, only Social Security ($1,800/month) and a $400k IRA. She was 70% in stocks. I warned her about sequence risk. She didn't listen. Then 2022 happened – stocks fell 18%, bonds fell too. She had to sell at a loss to pay property taxes. She ended up moving to a cheaper apartment. Today she's 30% stocks and regrets not listening.

The difference? John had a stable income stream. Mary didn't. Your personal situation matters more than any rule.

Frequently Asked Questions

I have $300k and need $1,500/month from it. Should I get out of stocks?
That's a 6% withdrawal rate – higher than the recommended 4%. If you're all in stocks, a bad sequence could wipe you out. I'd allocate 3 years of expenses ($54k) to cash/bonds and the rest in a balanced fund (50/50). You'll likely need to reduce spending or work part‑time to make it sustainable.
What if I already have a big pension that covers everything – should I still own stocks?
If your pension covers 100% of needs, you have the luxury of taking risk for heirs or charity. Holding 40–60% stocks makes sense for long‑term growth. Just keep 2 years of cash so you never have to sell stocks during a crash.
Isn't it safer to just buy annuities with everything?
Annuities guarantee income but lock your money up and often have low returns after inflation. I've seen clients regret buying too much annuity because they couldn't access cash for emergencies. A better approach: annuity for essential expenses up to 40% of savings, the rest in a balanced portfolio.
My advisor says I'm too old for stocks – should I fire him?
If your advisor gives a blanket statement without analyzing your full picture, that's a red flag. At 70, you could live 20 more years. Being 100% out of stocks means you'll lose purchasing power. A good advisor will tailor the stock allocation to your income, health, and risk tolerance.

This article reflects real experiences from advising retirees over a decade. It has been fact‑checked against current financial guidelines.